make other meta-learning algorithms implemented in l2l.
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
mohamad maheri a23a4ec823 generic algorithms and parameters 1 month ago
movielens/ml-1m melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
.gitignore melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
README.md melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
data_generation.py melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
dataset.py melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
embedding_module.py melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
embeddings.py melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
evidence_candidate.py melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
fast_adapt.py melu by l2l + MetaSGD 1 month ago
learnToLearn.py generic algorithms and parameters 1 month ago
learnToLearnTest.py generic algorithms and parameters 1 month ago

README.md

MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendation

PyTorch implementation of the paper: “MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendation”, KDD, 2019.

Abstract

This paper proposes a recommender system to alleviate the coldstart problem that can estimate user preferences based on only a small number of items. To identify a user’s preference in the cold state, existing recommender systems, such as Netflix, initially provide items to a user; we call those items evidence candidates. Recommendations are then made based on the items selected by the user. Previous recommendation studies have two limitations: (1) the users who consumed a few items have poor recommendations and (2) inadequate evidence candidates are used to identify user preferences. We propose a meta-learning-based recommender system called MeLU to overcome these two limitations. From metalearning, which can rapidly adopt new task with a few examples, MeLU can estimate new user’s preferences with a few consumed items. In addition, we provide an evidence candidate selection strategy that determines distinguishing items for customized preference estimation. We validate MeLU with two benchmark datasets, and the proposed model reduces at least 5.92% mean absolute error than two comparative models on the datasets. We also conduct a user study experiment to verify the evidence selection strategy.

Usage

Requirements

  • python 3.6+
  • pytorch 1.1+
  • tqdm 4.32+
  • pandas 0.24+

Preparing dataset

It needs about 22GB of hard disk space.

import os
from data_generation import generate
master_path= "./ml"
if not os.path.exists("{}/".format(master_path)):
    os.mkdir("{}/".format(master_path))
    generate(master_path)

Training a model

Our model needs support and query sets. The support set is for local update, and the query set is for global update.

import torch
import pickle
from MeLU import MeLU
from options import config
from model_training import training
melu = MeLU(config)
model_filename = "{}/models.pkl".format(master_path)
if not os.path.exists(model_filename):
    # Load training dataset.
    training_set_size = int(len(os.listdir("{}/warm_state".format(master_path))) / 4)
    supp_xs_s = []
    supp_ys_s = []
    query_xs_s = []
    query_ys_s = []
    for idx in range(training_set_size):
        supp_xs_s.append(pickle.load(open("{}/warm_state/supp_x_{}.pkl".format(master_path, idx), "rb")))
        supp_ys_s.append(pickle.load(open("{}/warm_state/supp_y_{}.pkl".format(master_path, idx), "rb")))
        query_xs_s.append(pickle.load(open("{}/warm_state/query_x_{}.pkl".format(master_path, idx), "rb")))
        query_ys_s.append(pickle.load(open("{}/warm_state/query_y_{}.pkl".format(master_path, idx), "rb")))
    total_dataset = list(zip(supp_xs_s, supp_ys_s, query_xs_s, query_ys_s))
    del(supp_xs_s, supp_ys_s, query_xs_s, query_ys_s)
    training(melu, total_dataset, batch_size=config['batch_size'], num_epoch=config['num_epoch'], model_save=True, model_filename=model_filename)
else:
    trained_state_dict = torch.load(model_filename)
    melu.load_state_dict(trained_state_dict)

Extracting evidence candidates

We extract evidence candidate list based on the MeLU.

from evidence_candidate import selection
evidence_candidate_list = selection(melu, master_path, config['num_candidate'])
for movie, score in evidence_candidate_list:
    print(movie, score)

Note that, you may have a different evidence candidate list from the paper. That’s because we do not open the random seeds of data generation and model training.

Citation

If you use this code, please cite the paper.

@inproceedings{lee2019melu,
  title={MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendation},
  author={Lee, Hoyeop and Im, Jinbae and Jang, Seongwon and Cho, Hyunsouk and Chung, Sehee},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery \& Data Mining},
  pages={1073--1082},
  year={2019},
  organization={ACM}
}