it doesn't work correctly
This reverts commit f1d554d2bb74ac1cfd82d2a466488c6b6ab247e5, reversing
changes made to a51235aaab.

- fix IPA chars for "s;" and "z;" phonemes
- add bug note about "...i a..." case

- fixed/removed not working rules in be_list
- added stress to the words in be_list
- fixed multi thousand transcription
- removed not working rules in be_rules
- added rules of palatalization, phonemes lengthen
- fixed dropping of [a] at the end of words
- fixed message "Full dictionary is not installed for"
- added configuration in tr_languages.c
- fixed/added phonemes for `Q`, `ts`, `ts;`, `dz`, `dz.`, `;` etc

This patch strip out dependency on Russian, as its complicated relationship
between spelling and pronunciation overburden rules for Belarusian. The rules
themselves are also added. They don't have devoicing at the end of the words
for now. Also, gemination of consonants doesn't work as expected, as it seems
on the top of this rule some other rules apply. This after-processing is
responsible also for the strange behaviour of ending [a].

cmn (Mandarin chinese) has been broken since 4825905.

This fix makes mandarin behave more like Cantonese. Instead of
translating characters, we search for dictionary matches.

The functionality of normal vs Chao tones should be investigated more.
Looks like latin characters as pinyin still uses Chao tones whereas
the characters in cmn_list and cmn_listx do not.

See #1044 for discussion. See also #1028 and #1163.

Myanmar/Burmese (my) uses phonemetable ph_myanmar instead.

Fixup for commit 89768755.

This is the only reference to the language.

This is the only reference to the language.

Language 'bo' has no data files. Tibetan might have been supported
before but clearly isn't any longer.

As this is the behaviour when building eSpeak

This commit implements support for [Totontepec Mixe](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totontepec_Mixe). The Espeak rules are based on the phonological inventory, orthographic mappings, and phonetic processes described in the "Esbozo fonológico" (phonological outline/sketch) chapter of Verónica Guzmán Guzmán's 2012 master's thesis in Indo American Linguistics awarded by the [Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social](https://ciesas.edu.mx/) and *Vocabulario Mixe de Totontepec* (Totontepec Mixe vocabulary), compiled by Alvin Schoenhals and Louise C. Schoenhals and published by the Summer Institute of Linguistics in 1965.

This commit was developed as part of a project for [Computational Linguistics](https://jnw.domains.swarthmore.edu/ling073/syllabus.php) at [Swarthmore College](https://swarthmore.edu). We feel that this language is suitable for merge with "testing" status, but further verification/improvements by native speakers would be very helpful.

co-authored-by: Elizabeth Resendiz <[email protected]>

Fix #1083 and improve some things in German

This reverts commit 433d219eca.

This reverts commit 02783150cd.

⟨o⟩ almost certainly represents [ɔ] – Appendix E of The Lord of the
Rings describes it as the sound in English “for”. This means we should
use a phoneme [[O]], not [[o]]; we should also create our own phoneme
for this, since the one we inherit from Latin sounds much more like [o]
to me.

In Quenya, long ⟨ó⟩ (and, presumably, ⟨ô⟩) is, according to Appendix E,
“tenser and ‘closer’”, which presumably means [o]. (Online sources seem
to agree.) The Latin [[o:]] phoneme works well enough for this.

In Sindarin, ⟨ó⟩ has “the same quality” as ⟨o⟩ according to Appendix E,
so emit it as [[O:]] for [ɔː]. This sounds sensible enough te me.

I’m undecided whether “Lothlórien” should be in sjn_list, to pronounce
it with [oː] instead of [ɔː]. It’s composed of Sindarin “loth” and
Quenya “Lórien”, so that could potentially justify a pronunciation with
a Quenya ⟨ó⟩. But then again, maybe it should be a standard Sindarin
⟨ó⟩. For now, I’ve opted to not add it; in the film The Fellowship of
the Ring, Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen) says “Lothlórien” after the
Fellowship leave Moria, and to me his ⟨ó⟩ sounds more like [ɔː] than
[oː], so if this is wrong, at least it’s no more wrong than the famous
movie adaptation :)